Senator Seeks Harsher Punishment for Some Dangerous Dog Owners
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Updated: 10:51 PM Feb 11, 2009
Senator Seeks Harsher Punishment for Some Dangerous Dog Owners
Lincoln
If a dog attacks and injures a person in Nebraska, some dog owners could face a felony instead of a misdemeanor. That is the intent of one LB 494, proposed by Senator Beau McCoy of Omaha.
Posted: 10:45 PM Feb 11, 2009
Reporter: Chie Saito
Email Address: chie.saito@kolnkgin.com
width:200 and height: 150 and picwidth: 200 and pciheight: 150
Font Size:

If a dog attacks and injures a person in Nebraska, some dog owners could face a felony instead of a misdemeanor. That is the intent of LB 494, proposed by Senator Beau McCoy of Omaha.

Under LB 494, an owner could be charged with a felony in cases where a dog previously classified as "dangerous" by the animal control violently attacks and injures a person. The felony charge carries a maximum penalty of five years behind bars. According to current statute, a specific dog can be labeled "dangerous", if it has killed a human being; injured a person enough that the person required medical attention; killed a domestic animal without being provoked, or if it has previously been classified as "potentially dangerous" by the animal control.

According to figures from the animal control, there are two dozen dogs in Lincoln that were labeled "dangerous" in 2008. The breed of these "dangerous" dog range from a rat terrier to a Labrador.

Among those who testified in support of the bill was Omaha resident Wendy Blevins. Blevins testified that she and her 16 month old daughter were attacked last June by a pit bull.

"Mentally and emotionally I am plagued with the fact that I could have lost my daughter. The attack plays over and over in my mind and I see the images of my daughter's scalp being ripped off," said Blevins.

Senator McCoy says the bill is not only intended to punish dangerous dog owners.

"LB 494 will be a strong tool to help committees impose penalties which would significantly improve public safety," said McCoy.

During his testimony, McCoy cited many examples of violent dog attacks.

"Over the weekend this issue became very personal for my family, as well as for families across district 39 when less than a mile from my home 48 year old Lorri Ellis of Omaha was attacked by what this bill defines as a dangerous dog," said McCoy.

However, Senator Steve Lathrop of Omaha who sits on the Judiciary Committee took issue with some of the language in the bill.

"It just seems to me that as written we're taking, we're trying to get to the guy who has a pit bull that tears some body's arm off or their scalp or something, but it's so broad that it can actually get that yippy dog that twice bites somebody," said Lathrop.

It is now up to the Judiciary Committee to decide whether to advance the bill.


Latest Comments

Posted by: chris Location: lincoln on Feb 13, 2009 at 03:00 PM

shouldnt there also be punishment for the dogs? uthanize? the humaine society does it every day to nice dogs without anger problems, why isnt that in the news? only the bad dogs get recognized noth the good ones. a dogs personality is created by the owner
Posted by: Jen Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 05:18 PM

Yippy dog = ankle biter (small dogs) I believe is what they are trying to say :)
Posted by: MJ Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 02:25 PM

What's a "yippy dog"?
Posted by: Anonymous on Feb 12, 2009 at 01:56 PM

Maybe we should just not have dogs as pets anymore. We forget that dogs are animals. What happens if your dog is in your fenced in yard and a kid gets bit (through the fence) for bugging the dog? A felony for the dog owner who already had the dog in a fenced yard?
Posted by: Anonymous Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 12:00 PM

After they get done with this Dog issue, could they look into some sort of chicken ban. My Mom's Rooster is MEAN! He attacks and leaves marks.
Posted by: Lincoln Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 11:16 AM

It is about time, I'm tired of people who can't control there pets. It is about time to see them stand for there wrecklessness and lack of responsibility.
Posted by: Caroline Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 10:30 AM

This legislation is too broad--"potentially dangerous?"--I agree with Senator Lathrop that we should not punish the old lady with the yippy white Yorkie.
Posted by: Suzie Location: Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 09:22 AM

If we are putting these kind of charges against some one it should not matter if it is a small yippy dog or a large dog. Small dogs can do damage also...if stitches are involved there are scars! Not all pitbulls or rottwiellers are vicious! It is also in the nature of an animal to protect their space!
Posted by: angie Location: lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 07:56 AM

It is about time that everyone realizes that not only pitbulls should be included in a dangerous dog law...even the "yippy" dogs that bites someone is included. The stiffer penalties are what was needed all along. Holding the owner responsible for the dogs actions. A good owner would not even have to worry about charges no matter what breed of dog they own.
Posted by: a mom Location: So. Lincoln on Feb 12, 2009 at 06:36 AM

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!! It is about time that we start to punish the owners more harshly!! Think of our innocent children that have already been injured! The scars go much deeper than we realize! How traumatic for these little ones, for anyone who has been attacked by a dangerous dog!!
Big Bonus Bucks: Sanchez Restaurant
First at 4