|
|
|
Updated: 10:52 PM Nov 18, 2009
Embryonic Stem Cell Research: Will a Ban Help or Harm the University of Nebraska?
Lincoln Four members of the University of Nebraska Board of Regents have drafted a resolution that would limit embryonic stem-cell research at the university system's facilities, but is it the right direction to go in?
Posted: 10:07 PM Nov 18, 2009Reporter: Terra Hall Email Address: Terra.Hall@1011now.com |
|
16 Comments 
Jim Strand supports embryonic stem cell research because of its potential to treat debilitating diseases.
"The country was founded on the basis that we wanted a separation between church and state," said Strand. "But we have now an ideological issue along principally religious lines trying to dictate research issues and guidelines in a state university."
Strand worries the University of Nebraska regents' recent resolution that could prohibit the use of embryonic stem cell research will not only prevent those suffering from getting cures, but that it will hurt the university as well.
"If you're trying to attract top notch researchers or teachers and you have the reputation for a governing board, that has chosen along narrow ideological grounds, to ban certain endeavors - that is just not the kind of institution that many people are going to take a second look at," said Strand.
But as one of the resolution's co-authors, Regent Tim Clare does not support embryonic stem cell research.
"It's not just the four members of the Board of Regents that have pulled this from the sky," said Clare. "It's one that has been looked at and studied by lots and lots of people."
Instead he wants the university to go in a different direction.
"The mission that we want to have the Medical Center proceed is one in becoming the international leader in the adult form of stem cell research which has proven to be very successful," Clare said.
Still supporters of embryonic stem cell research say excluding it in the state could prevent scientists from finding cures to disease.
"I don't deny the regents from having their own personal points of view, but I think they need to be elected and looking broadly enough at issues to set their own personal issues aside and do what's best for the University of Nebraska," said Strand.
A 2008 Nebraska law prohibits the use of state money or facilities for creating or destroying embryos for stem-cell research using a technique commonly referred to as therapeutic cloning.
The NU Board of Regents will meet this Friday to consider the resolution that would limit the research to pre-existing lines approved under the Bush administration. The public is welcome attend and speak.
To get your voice heard, contact: Donal Burns at djburns@nebraska.edu or 402-472-0075.
Latest Comments
PAUL-So how is it we have any laws since all laws are based on someones morality,(or lack of)? As far as representatives, they are supposed to be restricted to the constituion and if they were we would not even be having this discussion. Besides if abortion is a right (which its not) and the government has to supply rights, then if I'm to poor to buy a gun the government should have to buy me one.
KELLY- I would like to point you to this article: http://topics.law.cornell.edu/wex/establishment_clause It is from Cornell University. It states again what I wrote in my post on 11/25, that the law is protected from religion, just as religion is protected from law. In then end since we don't know which religions definition of rights to use, no religion can be preferred. Another problem with your statement is that the state is not interfering with your belief by having a tax. You are still free to believe as you always have. As a citizen of the state (US or NE) you have agreed to live under the rule of the law of the land, in this case a republic where representatives elected by majority vote make decisions and we live by the laws they create. You don't pay an abortion tax, or a stem cell research tax. You pay your taxes and the officials that you have elected decide how the money should be spent. To change these laws you must change the officials which you are free to do by voting.
PAUL- Impossible since our rights come from God and not from government, governments can only grant privleges. This is what the framers also believed. If what you say is true I should be able to with hold paying any tax my faith disagrees with or the state is interfering with my religion.
| Stories with Most Comments |
| Close Vote Expected on Repealing Nebraska Helmet Law 58 Comments |
| Shooting Without Death Threat Could be OK in Neb 28 Comments |
| Dr. Yazdi Issues First Statement Since Solicitation Allegations 22 Comments |
| Lincoln, UNL May Partner on 16,000-Seat Arena 21 Comments |
| Man Arrested for Attack with Baton and Gun 12 Comments |
| Bill Questions In-State Tuition Law for Undocumented Students 10 Comments |
| Gasoline Prices. |
