LSO: Business Owner Arrested In Case of Missing Jewelry
Save Email Print
Bookmark and Share
Posted: 10:16 PM May 13, 2010
LSO: Business Owner Arrested In Case of Missing Jewelry
Lincoln
The case of $53,000 in missing jewelry has been solved after the arrest of a Lincoln business owner.
Reporter: KOLNKGIN
Email Address: desk@1011now.com
width:275 and height: 198 and picwidth: 222 and pciheight: 159
Font Size:

The case of $53,000 in missing jewelry has been solved after the arrest of a Lincoln business owner.

Lancaster County Sheriff Terry Wagner says his office has been investigating a case of missing jewelry since March 6th. Wagner says a Firth woman initially reported she stored $53,000 in jewelry inside the pedestal drawer of a new dryer she recently purchased. Wagner says the dryer was damaged during delivery, and the woman decided to return it. He says when the dryer was returned, and a new one was delivered, she feared the two boxes of jewelry were left inside the first pedestal drawer.

Wagner says during the investigation, the first drawer was located and checked, but the jewelry was not there. According to court documents, the woman later indicated the jewelry could have been inside the drum of an original dryer she had before buying the new one.

Court documents show the original dryer ended up at Todd's Appliances at 10th and Garfield Streets. Sheriff Wagner says the owners of the business, Todd and Tessa Hamersma, were contacted. Wagner says Todd Hamersma told investigators he did find the two boxes of jewelry in the old dryer drum. Wagner says Hamersma eventually sold the jewelry, after waiting a month to see if anyone would report it missing.

"There's indication that $6,100 of the money received from the jewelry was used to pay back taxes," Sheriff Wagner says.

Wagner says Hamersma sold the jewelry to a Lincoln jewelry store. Wagner says the jewelry store was very cooperative in helping with the investigation. Some of the jewelry was recovered, however, Wagner says some of it was already melted down.

Todd Hamersma was arrested by Lancaster County deputies for Theft of property lost, mislaid, or delivered by mistake (Class IV Felony). His wife, Tessa Hamersma, was cited and released for Accessory to a Felony.


Latest Comments

Posted by: Anonymous on May 17, 2010 at 04:36 PM

Unfortunately, this sad story will have an end. I wonder though if the wife was running around wearing the jewelry since only part of it was sold. Think about all the others who work at the appliance store. Did they all know what happened? I am surprised no one who works at Todd's Appliance Store turned the jewelry boxes into the police. We have only heard about the husband and wife. Is there more to the story? I hope we hear a follow up.
Posted by: Anonymous on May 17, 2010 at 04:26 PM

I'm reading alot of these comments and the common thread seems to be mistakes in four different areas. It all could have been solved in the first place by the woman not leaving the jewels in the dryer, but elderly people sometimes do weird things. The final stage could have been reporting it to the police. Come on!! If you find that kind of wealth, it is a given that it is stolen or misplaced. My child found a quarter at the school playground and turned it into the office. Now that is honesty. If he would have reported the jewels, think how different this story would be? I don't think he deserves jail time, but this should be a lesson in honesty. It doesn't matter that IF he would have reported it, they would be his, like one of the comments said. He DIDN'T...
Posted by: Denece S. Location: Lincoln, NE on May 17, 2010 at 02:15 AM

What was this woman thinking? I can't fathom how anybody could stash over $53,000 in a dryer and forget about it! And why did it take two months for her to suddenly remember it, and then not remember which dryer it was in? If I had that much jewelry, I'd certainly know where it was at all times. For a small annual fee, she can get a safe deposit box at the bank, which would be cheap insurance. Even though enough time had probably lapsed for Mr. Hamersma to have claimed all of the jewelry, I think this woman should consider herself very lucky to have gotten any of it back. Even though Mr. Hamersma returned a lot of it, he should not have to reimburse her for what he sold. Economist Dave Ramsey says it best--this woman's loss should be considered her payment of a "stupid tax" for being that irresponsible with her possessions. The charges against Mr. Hamersma and his wife should be dropped, and he should receive a formal apology from Sheriff Wagner and the County Attorney.
Posted by: Come on! Location: Here in Nebraska on May 15, 2010 at 02:51 AM

He found it March 9. She didn't even report it til May 6. If he reported it to police, it would still be his after 30 days anyways. More details in the Lincoln Journal Star's online story. Why isn't the Jewelry store an accomplice for not reporting this? Receiving stolen goods? Doesn't seem like anyone here cares to hear his side of the story, either. To Jenny: Yes I feel for the Lady, but her sad story doesn't make him a bad guy either. Two people made mistakes here (actually 3 if you count the jeweler). Her for 1)putting jewelry in the dryer (what was she thinking?) 2)not reporting it for 2 months, and 3) not calling Lowes to tell them about it. Then him for not thinking of letting the police know. Shouldn't the jewelry store be made aware of missing jewelry? Shouldn't they be suspicious of such a transaction? I think mercy is called for here. If the guy has no criminal record, I say drop the charges or reduce them to very small misdemeanor. OJ got less for murder
Posted by: Anonymous on May 15, 2010 at 02:03 AM

To 'Anonymous' (May 14 at 02:38 PM) Ever heard of 'innocent till proven guilty'? How do you know he didn't try to find the rightful owner? Because the NEWS on TV didn't say he did? Have you heard his side of the story? Have you even met the guy? You just 'know' he's dishonest? Because the POLICE charged him? The same police dept. who recently suspended 28 'honest' officers for watching hours of TV instead of doing the jobs they are paid good money for? I've bought several items from him over the years. And yes he does get 'junk' appliances. He restores them and resells them. (Good job too. Our first purchase was a cheap dryer that lasted 10 years!) He never did direct business with her. She bought from Lowes. They sold it to him. He probably called them to check. If he reported it to police, it would still be his after 30 days, because she didn't even report it for nearly 60 days!!! (He might've still given it back to her) Get more details from the Lincoln Journal Star.
Posted by: Anonymous on May 14, 2010 at 02:38 PM

I don't think he should serve time, however has he heard of being honest? When you find a wallet do you keep the money if there is no I.D.? An honest person would search for the rightful owner. If the police were able to track him down, couldn't he have at least asked the person or store that delivered the appliance if they knew these valuables were in it. It sounds like greed to me!! Obviously, it wasn't "junk" like one comment said. Some people have no morals or a sense of right and wrong.
Posted by: Lisa Location: Lincoln on May 14, 2010 at 01:14 PM

To Jenny and all others who are perfect: I hope when you are old (or older) you still have perfect memory and the advantage of close family and/or friends who can prod all your remembrances as you deal with getting older in a society which idolizes wealth, beauty and perfection. Not to even touch on life and health situations as older people experience,and worry about. And have you heard of inheritances, or owning something that's been in the family for generations? Or obtained in better days gone by??
Posted by: capitoL on May 14, 2010 at 11:47 AM

thanks for the all CAPS there LARRY. don't think i would've been able to see the point you were attempting to make with out them. i agree with the fishiness of this story. hope some truth is found somewhere. $53k in jewelry sounds a little excessive from firth. wonder how she accumulated all of that.
Posted by: no name on May 14, 2010 at 10:03 AM

According to msnbc, Lowes dropped it off at his business, so he would have no idea who the dryer used to belong to. He probably figured Lowes would call him and tell him someone lost it. It sounds like he waited 30 days and no one called. He made a mistake, same as the woman who owned it. He didn't use the money to buy drugs, instead he paid his taxes. Sound dishonest? Not to me.
Posted by: Bill Location: Lincoln on May 14, 2010 at 09:10 AM

How can anyone be sure he knew who the old dryer belonged to? They're not like cars that have a title etc. They're just old junk people have hailed away when they buy something new. Why on earth would he need to keep a record of who it belonged to? It probably sat for days with a bunch of other old dryers he received and couldn't remember who it belonged to. Like old tires. Sounds like he made a mistake. If he is a criminal, why is trying to pay his taxes? That it itself says he tries to do the right thing.
Posted by: dummy up on May 14, 2010 at 06:44 AM

well at least he hopefully got those [word omitted] taxes taken care of! The things our Govt. makes us do...end the fed.
Posted by: Jenny-again on May 14, 2010 at 06:10 AM

I'm neiter stupid or undereducated as Sammie suggests, at least I didn't "forget" or hide jewerly in a drum, and then not but sure if I had or not? Ever heard of a safe? You can buy a small one that has a lock and everything, imagine that! Talk about being naive! The story sound fishy to me...
Posted by: difCitizen Location: Lincoln on May 13, 2010 at 08:51 PM

You know the dryer was sold as-is, which contained the stuff. I dont think he should be ticketed because the lady STUPIDLY left her belongs in there. That is her stupidity not his crime.
Posted by: Sammi Location: Lincoln on May 13, 2010 at 07:06 PM

Jenny: You say you would have done the same thing? You're a little naive or undereducated. Todd knew where the dryer came from, he had the information about the lady, he should have contacted her, but didn't because, as Carol says, he really wanted to keep it and not take the chance the lady would rightfully claim it. He had tax issues. He thought he would get away with it. The law says REPORT IT. He knew he was stealing and will pay for it. I feel badly some of her jewelry has already been melted down.
Posted by: LARRY HERGERT Location: 324 TAYLOR PARK DRIVE on May 13, 2010 at 04:10 PM

THE RIGHT THING TO DO IS TO REPORT TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES THE FOUND JEWELRY AND LET THEM FOLLOW UP. JUST DO THE RIGHT THING AND NOT BLAME THE WOMAN THAT LOST THE JEWELRY
Big Bonus Bucks: Sanchez Restaurant
First at 4